《计算机应用研究》|Application Research of Computers

信息不对称环境下制造商基于信任因子的产能决策问题

Trust-based capacity decision under asymmetric information

免费全文下载 (已被下载 次)  
获取PDF全文
作者 林荔菲,董明,韩广华
机构 上海交通大学 a.安泰经济与管理学院;b.国际与公共事务学院,上海 200030
统计 摘要被查看 次,已被下载
文章编号 1001-3695(2018)03-0733-04
DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3695.2018.03.019
摘要 在信息不对称的供应链中,市场需求预测信息的共享不仅会影响制造商的产能决策,也会影响终端需求满足率从而影响供应链成员的利润。研究在有一个制造商和多个零售商的供应链中,将信任视为一个0~1的连续变量,建立信任因子模型讨论信任在信息共享中对制造商产能决策的影响。通过对模型的求解可以得到制造商的产能决策分别与零售商汇报的市场需求信息和制造商对零售商的信任程度呈现正相关关系。同时,通过数值分析对信任因子模型进行仿真求解以及灵敏度分析,表明了模型的有效性。
关键词 信息共享;信任;产能决策;供应链
基金项目 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71632008,71371123,71501128)
上海交通大学文理交叉基金资助项目(15JCZY05)
上海市政府决策咨询研究重点项目(2016-A-018-A)
本文URL http://www.arocmag.com/article/01-2018-03-019.html
英文标题 Trust-based capacity decision under asymmetric information
作者英文名 Lin Lifei, Dong Ming, Han Guanghua
机构英文名 a.AntaiCollegeofEconomics&Management,b.SchoolofInternational&PublicAffairs,ShanghaiJiaoTongUniversity,Shanghai200030,China
英文摘要 In the supply chain with asymmetry information, information sharing about forecast demand not only could affect capacity decision of manufacturer, but also affected the demand fulfill of end customers. This paper identified trust as a conti-nuous variable between 0 and 1, and quantified how trust influences capacity decision in a supply chain with multiple retailers. This paper illustrated that in a one-time interaction, capacity investment decision of manufacturer was respectively increasing in retailers’ report and manufacturer’s trust in retailers. In the meanwhile, this paper discussed the trust-based model by numerical analysis and shows the effectiveness of the model.
英文关键词 information sharing; trust; capacity decision; supply chain
参考文献 查看稿件参考文献
  [1] Cachon G P, Lariviere M A. Contracting to assure supply:how to share demand forecasts in a supply chain[J] . Management Science, 2001, 47(5):629-646.
[2] Spiliotopoulou E, Donohue K, Gürbüz M C. Information reliability in supply chains:the case of multiple retailers[J] . Production & Operations Management, 2016, 25(3):548-567.
[3] 叶飞, 薛运普. 供应链伙伴间信息共享对运营绩效的间接作用机理研究—关系资本为中间变量[J] . 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(6):112-125.
[4] Inderfurth K, Sadrieh A, Voigt G. The impact of information sharing on supply chain performance under asymmetric information[J] . Production & Operations Management, 2013, 22(2):410-425.
[5] Lee H L, Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain:the bullwhip effect[J] . Management Science, 1997, 50(4):1875-1886.
[6] Han Guanghua, Dong Ming. Trust-embedded coordination in supply chain information sharing[J] . International Journal of Production Research, 2015(18):1-16.
[7] Xu He. Managing production and procurement through option contracts in supply chains with random yield[J] . International Journal of Production Economics, 2010, 126(2):306-313.
[8] Lee H L, So K C, Tang C S. The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain[J] . Management Science, 2000, 46(5):626-643.
[9] zalp , Wei Wei. Strategic commitments for an optimal capacity decision under asymmetric forecast information[J] . Management Science, 2006, 52(8):1238-1257.
[10] zer , Zheng Yanchong, Chen K Y. Trust in forecast information sharing[J] . Management Science, 2011, 57(6):1111-1137.
[11] 王先甲, 周鑫. 包含信任的供应链预测信息共享问题研究[J] . 软科学, 2014, 28(7):110-113.
[12] Neda E, Wallace H, Iravani S M R. Trust and information sharing in supply chains[J] . Production & Operations Management, 2012, 21(3):444-464.
[13] Fu Xiao, Dong Ming, Liu Shaoxuan, et al. Trust based decisions in supply chains with an agent[J] . Decision Support Systems, 2016, 82:35-46.
[14] 李亮, 卢捷琦, 季建华. 降低信息共享风险的价格补偿模式研究[J] . 软科学, 2014, 28(7):105-109.
[15] Cachon G P, Lariviere M A. An equilibrium analysis of linear, proportional and uniform allocation of scarce capacity[J] . IIE Transactions, 1999, 31(9):835-849.
[16] Cachon G P, Lariviere M A. Capacity choice and allocation:strategic behavior and supply chain performance[J] . Management Science, 1999, 45(8):1091-1108.
[17] Chen Yefen, Su Xuanming, Zhao Xiaobo. Modeling bounded ratio-nality in capacity allocation games with the quantal response equilibrium[J] . Management Science, 2012, 58(10):1952-1962.
[18] Pezeshki Y, Baboli A, Cheikhrouhou N, et al. A rewarding-punishing coordination mechanism based on trust in a divergent supply chain[J] . European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, 230(3):527-538.
[19] Lundquist T, Ellingsen T, Gribbe E, et al. The cost of lying[J] . Working Paper, 2007, 4(5399):1710.
[20] Gneezy U. Deception:the role of consequences[J] . American Economic Review, 2010, 95(1):384-390.
[21] Aviv Y. A time-series framework for supply-chain inventory management[J] . Operations Research, 2003, 51(2):210-227.
收稿日期 2016/11/20
修回日期 2017/1/3
页码 733-736,741
中图分类号 TP391
文献标志码 A